|
These forces are still active and continue to impact
how Taiwan considers itself as a nation both locally
and at an international level. Furthermore Taiwan's
socio-politics between itself and China remain on-going
and seem to remain in a continuous international deadlock.
Ultimately though given the relationship between Taiwan
and China, international partners welcome Taiwan's economic
practice but often ignore its cultural activity in order
not to offend China. It therefore these interactions
that have limited the visibility of Taiwan's art at
both an international level and through cultural exchange.
All of these factors again have contributed to how
artists respond in Taiwan to the socio-political and
cultural environments. The search for an appropriate
aesthetic response and subject is complicated as compared
to past experiences and social histories in Taiwan.
Today, I believe Taiwanese artists are considering their
practice and strategies in relation to the global art
market in hopes this vocabulary is better understood
while they interject their own ideologies into this
structure. This movement or "positioning"
relates a confidence Taiwanese artists have in regard
their own identity - both past and present. In addressing
and deconstructing Taiwanese art, thus, these complex
and evolving states need to be considered as a subtext
to the pictorial plane.
By staging four biennale programs to date, Taiwan is
positioning itself as a provider of contemporary art
within international art markets. The biennial has had
positive benefits locally too, as Taiwanese artists
and centers becoming active partners in delivery of
this event. Likewise from a Taiwanese perspective, the
biennial ironically reinforces Taiwan's binary history
and immersion in both representing foreign and local
ideologies within the institution. This strategy I will
classify as "mutual cross-cultural positioning
and pollinization." The Taipei Biennial is structured
whereby an international and a local curator work to
co-ordinate the exhibition. Like Taiwan's past, this
binary structure of a foreign and local curator working
together creates dynamics which further positions Taiwan's
identity in the global market.
The first Taipei Biennial "Site of Desire"
was curated by Fumio Nanjo of Japan and focused on Taiwan's
relationship to Asia as implicity understood by the
invitational countries - China, Japan and Korea. The
exhibition "Site of Desire" addressed socio-
economic developments which spurred rapid capital and
cultural growth in the 1990s in Asia. This exhibition
addressed both the influx of foreign capital and the
shift at local centers responding to this economic revolution.
Works exhibited at this event truly gave a sense of
urgency and reflected on how the local was being changed.
For instance, Chinese artist Cai Kuo-Qiang completely
surrounded the Taipei Fine Arts museum with large billboards.
Advertising various products where the art began and
ended became a question the viewer had to negotiate
when encountering this work. Taiwanese artist Wang Jun-jie,
on the other hand, deconstructed infomercials and product
placement by creating a media installation and series
of objects for sale at the museum. Wang Jun-jie's product
placements in the museum reflected upon hyper-consumerism
as a mean to deconstruct the media phenomenon associated
with high capitalism. This work also served as a metaphor
expressing Taiwan's inevitable progression forward into
a post-industrial/media age. Chen Chieh-jen presented
in this exhibition, digital photographs which reflected
on historical gaps in the visual record about post-colonialism.
Another exhibiting Taiwanese artist, Wu Ma-li presented
works about the social; whereas, Wu Tian-Chang and Hou
Chun-ming exhibited works drawn from everyday social
realities and reinforced concepts of what the Taiwanese
call "kitsch culture." The Biennial theme
"Site of Desire" was well considered in this
exhibition, addressing the socio and economic conditions
of rapid growth within Asia through media and consumer
strategies.
The 2000 Biennial continued to be dominated by installation
works. Jerome Sans from France in conjunction with Manray
Hsu from Taiwan curated the second biennial. Like its
former incarnation, works exhibited in 2000 continued
to express a playfulness through fanciful installations.
Most Taiwanese artists in this exhibition, unlike the
first, were no longer interested in social political
concerns and instead focused on human relationships
between information delivery and interactivity. Hong
Tung-lu produced a series of light boxes. For this work,
the artist used Japanese video game characters positioned
in front of well known images drawn from Western art
historical sources. The video game characters stand
attentive to the future, leaving the past behind. This
artwork, seemingly simple, depicts a new imposition
of how art is delivered through new media. Furthermore
the adoption of Japanese game characters by Hong Tame characters by Hong Tung-lu
is a reflection of Taiwan's current popular cultural
interests.
|