|
Over the past few weeks I have had the opportunity
of interviewing Douglas Easterly, one of the members
of the artist collective SWAMP, an acronym standing
for "Studies in Work Atmospheres and Mass Production".
SWAMP is a group concerned with providing a platform
for "negative feedback"1
particularly focusing but not exclusively on North American
society, the mass media, and the technology market.
Their artistic practice includes elements of media collage,
robotics/cybernetics, biometrics, and performance, to
all of which the process of collaboration is crucial.
The concept of collaboration lends a critical element
to an art work, the idea of community as opposed to
the individual. Within the construct of a community
the interests of the whole are more vital than those
of the individual, hence in this type of artistic practice
the idea of the lone artistic genius is ignored, and
the work becomes a piece of social interaction and coordination.
This according to Easterly "works in tandem with our
[SWAMP's] general philosophy of art making; that art
should be a revolt, not only against authority, but
also against the traditional ideas of the artistic genius
and virtuosity."2
My questions of SWAMP's artistic works and practice
focused on the various roles that technology plays within
the construct of their ideologies and productions. Technology
has acquired a central, if not life sustaining, role
in most of our lives. It frames the way individuals,
communicate, interact with the environment and other
beings, their means of consumption and for some sustains
them in a more direct physical manner3.
In accordance with SWAMP's idea that "art should be
a revolt", they have produced works that use advanced
technologies in an attempt to subvert their use and
form a critique of human technology interaction, and
the behaviors and attitudes that are created within
this matrix. This social critique is the basis of SWAMP's
subversion of technology. Within this framework it is
no longer left to governments and global industry to
solely apply the use of technology, but rather acts
to question the very uses applied to technology by these
entities and how its usage affects our social environment
and ecosystem. Parallel and inter-linked with this discourse
in this dialogue is how societal ideals of growth and
progress are applied to the technology market and how
Easterly and the other collaborators of SWAMP approach
these ideologies in their practice.
The following is the body of the interview I conducted with Douglas Easterly in March and April of 2005:
Daylen Luchsinger (DL): What is the relationship(s)
that you see existing between technology and ecosystems?
Douglas Easterly (DE): Technology has an interesting
relationship with ecosystems. Cold environments would
not be on the list of human ecosystems without the technology
of fire, evolved through time into broilers, HVAC's
and parkas. So technology can expand an ecosystem, but
more often than not - especially over the past century,
it destroys the ecosystem, not only for humans, but
other life forms. This is due to exponential growth
of technology without any valuable negative feedback.
Classical cybernetics tells us that negative feedback
can be brought back into a system for the purpose of
having useful data to govern continued activity. The
thermometer in an air-conditioned room, or our perceived
view out of a window while driving a car, for example.
What is really lacking in our culture, is the powerful
voice of critical theory conditioning our social and
economic practices that are running amok, distressing
our psyche and ecosystems. So in summary, SWAMP work
is an attempt to provide critical theory as negative
feedback to a system that is teetering on possible future
self-extinction, which currently tortures many of our
living neighbors, human and other, world-wide.
Footnotes:
1 E-mail interview with Douglas Easterly, March/April 2005
2 E-mail interview with Douglas Easterly, March/April 2005
3 An example of this physical dependancy is the relation between the body and a pacemaker, as it regulates the heart and blood circulation.
|