Conceptualist photography has according to the artist
has affected the way in which he delivers his work.
The direct engagement between conceptual photography
and the net art piece may be abstract; however, when
one considers the process rather than the actual art
piece, Hamilton's concepts are understood. After al,
the art piece is cimple in its delivery and conviction.
What becomes more important is the message behind the
interaction. The piece is a medium to inform users about
how we communicate.
Hamilton does not openly see his work as net art but
as something more fluid. "I don't think we need
net art as a discipline. We still call a board with
some paint on it a "painting" for example,
but not necessarily because we think it needs to be
looked at as a painting first. We look at paintings
and sculptures and video in the same rooms, under the
broader category of "Art." Though there are
a few things I like about the avant-garde, for the most
part I'd rather not see it around anymore. I think art
suffers when it is expected to progress humanity or
elevate our spirits/being. I would like to see people's
expectation of art lower, I would like to see the objects
less valued. In my ideal viewing scenario, the viewer
doesn't even know that they are looking at art when
they first encounter it - the art is simply an unexpected
or unfamiliar alteration of everyday life. I like net
art that spreads through blogs and memes, and emails,
not through websites and online museums. I like it when
art is saleable only as a part of the works design."*
s a part of the works design."*
The limited communication frame presented to the user
remains this project's core. The impersonal nature of
the site spurns frustration and alienation. It heightens
awareness about how culture is becoming both impersonal
and unattached. The work forces the viewer to contemplate
communication from its most simple form and reinforces
concepts that other cumminication routes are possible
as well as other geographies. The project further asserts
that the desire for affirmation is never satisfied,
thus the user is bound to "continuously update"
their status, For Hamilton, when asked if the project
has been successful, the response is optimistic: "I
would call it successful so far, but it would be better
to see more activity."* And this is the project's
key, since being launched in 2003, and accompanied by
a large email send-outs. It has been slowly growing,
but it is still hard to find "someone out there".
I will conclude with the hope that the project will
convince the viewer leave the computer and go out and
meet someone face to face.
Kevin Hamilton's background is in studio art. Having
trained as a painter at the Rhode Island School of Design,
he soon jumped over to site-based projects preferring
to focus on video, web, and/or digital photography applications.
Through his graduate work at MIT's Visual Studies Program
he "began to more closely identify with how artists
engage in urban space," and took a particular interest
in the history of the European avant-garde movement.
Since then he has pursued work in and out of the gallery
setting. His work has been featured in festivals in
Madrid, Bilboa, and Vancouver, and in solo and group
exhibitions in Chicago, Memphis, and Champaign.
He currently holds a post at the University of Illinois
in Urbana-Champaign, where he lectures on contemporary
art and theory, teaches video and sound, and advises
graduate students.
Kevin Hamilton's website: http://www.synchronaut.net
Contact: Kevin Hamilton via email at: kham@iuic.edu
Footnotes:
* Quotes taken from
the interview with Kevin Hamilton
|