Elizabeth
Joe: While creating your
net project what/who are your influences? Do your ideas
emerge
from a group or from someone specific that you’ve
studied/analyzed?
Nanette Wylde: I respond to the cultural environment
around me. With “The Daily Planet Interactive” I
am thinking very specifically about information technologies,
control of and access to information, the fact that in
the U.S.A there are about six primary media conglomerates,
and that media is used to manipulate the masses. I am
also interested in the trend to invite audience participation
in a variety of formats. I am interested that in the
U.S. there is an upsurge of ‘reality’ TV
programming. I am interested in the interstice of what
people really feel is important, what they believe is
important, and what they are ‘told’ is important.
I am interested in the notions of celebrity, sensation,
and historical repetition.
EJ: Where is the history of this censorship coming
from – your idea of blocking information using
XXX’s?
NW: I don't think I am blocking information. I think
I am playing with
information and contemporary culture; and inviting the
web audience to play
with me. The headlines evoke a variety of possible narratives
in the minds
of the audience. When several headlines appear together
in the newspaper they start a dialogue. It is these narratives
and the relationships that
develop between them that engage me. The xxx's are meant
to clue the
audience that narratives exist. If I gave stories with
the headlines I
would be removing much of the potential for the audience's
imaginative and
associative play.
EJ: What country and city do you currently reside in?
NW: Chico and Redwood
City, California, U.S.A.
EJ: Do you feel your location plays a significant role
with respect to the content of your web project?
NW: Perhaps. I commute back and forth between two Northern
California towns. One is a rural, conservative, University
town. The other is a working class, culturally diverse,
suburban/industrial area of the South Bay Area of San
Francisco. My primary news source in both of these towns
is local National Public Radio. The information that
is reported on the two stations are very different. My
Secondary news source is small, local community newspapers.
I am interested in both what is considered newsworthy,
and how it is located in the structure of the news format.
The two different towns, where I spend much of my time,
process and spit out the ‘news’ very differently.
I live in the U.S. where access to information technologies
is relatively very high; and where ‘citizens’ have
the illusion of free speech, democracy, and the right
to know the ‘truth’.
EJ: What messages do you hope to instill in your viewers
by compiling seemingly ‘news worthy’ information
from, specifically, the radio (from two different towns)
and from local community newspapers? Would appropriating
headlines from large newspapers alter the impact/message
of your web project?
NW: The NPR news isn't in "The Daily Planet Interactive" only
the local community newspaper. I specifically worked
from the local papers because I wanted the mix of local
interests with the global report AND the local headlines
are often very creative/unconventional. I also found
that sometimes the headlines seem very different from
the story content (on the local level). Perhaps headlines
are written to lure, entice, entertain, and ultimately
sell the paper. |